Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g6LVt-0008H8-IB for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:06:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g6LVr-0003ns-AZ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:06:51 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g6LVr-0003nk-3U for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:06:51 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g6LVp-0006VT-4e for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:06:50 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w8TK6kfY007126; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 16:06:46 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andrew Dunstan cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Cygwin linking rules In-reply-to: <2392b7f2-331c-f324-ae62-79d70023b654@2ndQuadrant.com> References: <1056.1538235347@sss.pgh.pa.us> <86419508-9d36-36a9-93ff-2a051af7d2e4@2ndQuadrant.com> <2392b7f2-331c-f324-ae62-79d70023b654@2ndQuadrant.com> Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Dunstan message dated "Sat, 29 Sep 2018 14:17:33 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7124.1538251606.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 16:06:46 -0400 Message-ID: <7125.1538251606@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Andrew Dunstan writes: > Not sure where to go from here. What would happen if we stopped building libpq.a, so that the linker didn't have any choice about what to do? regards, tom lane