Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pKacA-0006r1-S7 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 07:54:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pKac9-0003Nz-PE for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 07:54:37 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pKac9-0003Nq-FC for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 07:54:37 +0000 Received: from wnew4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.18]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pKac6-0000Ch-Fo for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 07:54:37 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3E12B067BA; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 02:54:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 02:54:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1674633270; x= 1674640470; bh=oFeGU7Mvw1HM9PwMAKcJRMztktsjQFG0hGN2dpGrJAc=; b=L hwxOpSh7Mzo1nY52+izfL+L67f373cRReP3xCOkoRMKca7ihThGWOPbGy2414vCh 0rchXuZ1bAit6BJzEtEOGUUBWoX1C3I08apA9Fc/TIApWj2DWtq9VnnC7fsfcuL9 WjqX/pElNu3y87oR4ypPetEfQqc4q3B/1hh7mdjU1gPPihXYQZIZH/C+RyBiFQlx 3KUjdXA/OVCUsKeXPZT2E7AYQfk3ad2KqVGjFDYQBzucV/uXFETgaWL59EJnsq1T LJkYOMjMYA5Ix1lqcbviVSE6jmg1SAC+A5DbrAhmcApmPjtu3yDVWcMCbEFhMst5 ySMfaNnj7xwtzRVCl/saQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedruddvuddguddujecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfevfhfhjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheprfgv thgvrhcugfhishgvnhhtrhgruhhtuceophgvthgvrhdrvghishgvnhhtrhgruhhtsegvnh htvghrphhrihhsvggusgdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfejudeuleefheeu tddufeetjeevgeeiieeujeeuheefkedttdeuieeiieethfevnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgvthgvrhdrvghishgvnhhtrhgr uhhtsegvnhhtvghrphhrihhsvggusgdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i131946ab:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 02:54:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <7165e051-94c7-4e14-ff0a-043b34c67e9e@enterprisedb.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:54:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: drop postmaster symlink Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?B?RGV2cmltIEfDvG5kw7x6?= , Joe Conway , Robert Haas , Andres Freund Cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-hackers References: <252b8b14-dc3e-1c70-3da5-e59c1616f2ad@joeconway.com> <6b11c9efcd3a1d89719370224d84f8cd5e7b1a8c.camel@gunduz.org> <3705500.1669216069@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20221123195010.huuypoilx6lw7ceg@awork3.anarazel.de> <61846051-90b9-adb6-7627-08a374473a61@joeconway.com> <63a898b5-dc09-1ec1-40ec-e9d09e8304e7@enterprisedb.com> <05cd2e78dd3b7142f16fd7f14b1694c3520af345.camel@gunduz.org> From: Peter Eisentraut In-Reply-To: <05cd2e78dd3b7142f16fd7f14b1694c3520af345.camel@gunduz.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 12.01.23 20:11, Devrim Gündüz wrote: > On Thu, 2023-01-12 at 13:35 -0500, Joe Conway wrote: >> To be clear, I am completely in agreement with you about removing the >> symlink. I just wanted to be sure Devrim was alerted because I knew >> he had a strong opinion on this topic ;-) > > Red Hat's own packages, thus their users may be unhappy about that, > too. They also call postmaster directly. Devrim, Apart from your concerns, it appears there is consensus for making this change. The RPM packaging scripts can obviously be fixed easily for this. Do you have an objection to making this change?