Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cm3uP-0000Tq-8i for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 19:39:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cm3uO-0004fa-Po for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 19:39:32 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cm3sw-00024A-CE for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 19:38:02 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cm3ss-0001V7-3A for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 19:38:01 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v29JbrWR007257; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:37:53 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Robert Haas cc: Amit Langote , Simon Riggs , Corey Huinker , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning In-reply-to: References: <89ebfd64-e32e-5a23-139e-0db816390091@lab.ntt.co.jp> <082fb36c-b5d4-eba3-1054-927946a49630@lab.ntt.co.jp> <60a484df-ed59-3f48-55be-5bdf3b3d2165@lab.ntt.co.jp> <4eb8cfe4-b6c9-903d-4ce8-2a31fcee27e1@lab.ntt.co.jp> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas message dated "Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:26:50 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7255.1489088273.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 14:37:53 -0500 Message-ID: <7256.1489088273@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Robert Haas writes: > This is about list-ifying a note, but I think we should try to > de-note-ify it. It's a giant block of text that is not obviously more > noteworthy than the surrounding text; I think should be saved > for things that particularly need to be called out. Yeah. A big problem with the markup we use, imo, is that segments are displayed in a way that makes them more prominent than the surrounding text, not less so. That doesn't really square with my intuitive view of what a ought to be used for; it forces it to be considered as something only slightly less dangerous than a or , not as a parenthetical remark. But that's what we have to deal with so we should mark up our text accordingly. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers