Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czWsU-0005PD-Pd for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:13:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czWsT-00036U-Q5 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:13:13 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czWsT-00036L-85 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:13:13 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czWsO-0004YZ-SG for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 23:13:12 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v3FND4vX007295; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:13:05 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: Andreas Karlsson , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: OpenSSL support in our back branches In-reply-to: <20170415220649.ug2ya7ik7ivakgtk@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <5129.1492293840@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20170415220649.ug2ya7ik7ivakgtk@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Sat, 15 Apr 2017 15:06:49 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7293.1492297984.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 19:13:04 -0400 Message-ID: <7294.1492297984@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Andres Freund writes: > On 2017-04-15 18:04:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I see that buildfarm member anchovy has been failing in pre-9.5 >> branches for the last several weeks, with symptoms suggesting that >> it's been updated to openssl 1.1.0 or later. The failures are >> unsurprising given that commit 593d4e47d wasn't back-patched further >> than 9.5, but I wonder whether it isn't time to do that now. > +1. > I think Andreas already did some of the required work in > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/0c817abb-3f7d-20fb-583a-58f7593= a0bea%40proxel.se Oh, right. I'll see what I can do with that. regards, tom lane --=20 Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers