Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aljQ9-00041O-T7 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:42:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aljQ9-0006ds-En for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:42:25 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aljOn-0004x3-Ja for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:41:01 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aljOk-0005js-RO for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:41:00 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u2VKerF0007330; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:40:53 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Dean Rasheed , Tomas Vondra , Alexander Korotkov , Mark Dilger , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: improving GROUP BY estimation In-reply-to: <20160331203407.GA162729@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20160331203407.GA162729@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:34:07 -0300" Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:40:53 -0400 Message-ID: <7329.1459456853@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Alvaro Herrera writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Another minor gripe is the use of a random URL as justification. This >> code will still be around when that URL exists nowhere but the Wayback >> Machine. Can't we find a more formal citation to use? > The article text refers to this 1977 S. B. Yao paper "Approximating > block accesses in database organizations" which doesn't appear to be > available online, except behind ACM's paywall at > http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=359475 Well, a CACM citation is perfectly fine by my lights (especially one that's that far back and therefore certainly patent-free ...) Let's use something like this: See "Approximating block accesses in database organizations", S. B. Yao, Communications of the ACM, Volume 20 Issue 4, April 1977 Pages 260-261 regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers