Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyoA0-00029z-QD for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 21:19:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YyoA0-0000lv-1W for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 21:19:16 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyo9y-0000lk-Kn; Sat, 30 May 2015 21:19:14 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Yyo9v-0007Tt-R7; Sat, 30 May 2015 21:19:13 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4ULJ0m7007542; Sat, 30 May 2015 17:19:00 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: Robert Haas , Bruce Momjian , Stephen Frost , Magnus Hagander , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" , pgsql-core Subject: Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release In-reply-to: <20150530210232.GK13944@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <27697.1432929660@sss.pgh.pa.us> <28477.1432931820@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20150529223321.GB6535@alap3.anarazel.de> <12510.1432958887@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20150530154559.GA25053@momjian.us> <20150530210232.GK13944@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Sat, 30 May 2015 23:02:32 +0200" Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 17:19:00 -0400 Message-ID: <7541.1433020740@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Andres Freund writes: > * The signal handling, sinval, client communication changes. Little to > none problems so far, but it's complex stuff. These changes are an > example of potential for problems due to changes to reduce > complexity... As far as that goes, it's quite clear from the buildfarm that the atomics stuff is not very stable on non-mainstream architectures. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers