Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
Subject: Re: New Object Access Type hooks
From: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
In-Reply-To: <1922986.1649094077@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:44:25 -0700
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
 PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
 Joshua Brindle <joshua.brindle@crunchydata.com>,
 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
 Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>,
 Joe Conway <joe@crunchydata.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <757EFDF9-FBE3-489C-8CC0-35FD874F7D9A@enterprisedb.com>
References: <47F87A0E-C0E5-43A6-89F6-D403F2B45175@enterprisedb.com>
 <CA+hUKG+LOza8iSLiv6ymn=0R8S0x-R7KaqZmYfY+_b_cubcDOg@mail.gmail.com>
 <17BD82D7-49AC-40C9-8204-E7ADD30321A0@enterprisedb.com>
 <1918971.1649091790@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1922986.1649094077@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/757EFDF9-FBE3-489C-8CC0-35FD874F7D9A%40enterprisedb.com>
Precedence: bulk


> On Apr 4, 2022, at 10:41 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>=20
> Is our CI setup failing to capture stderr from TAP tests??

I'm looking into the way our TAP test infrastructure assigns port =
numbers to nodes, and whether that is reasonable during parallel test =
runs with nodes stopping and starting again.  On casual inspection, that =
doesn't seem ok, because the Cluster.pm logic to make sure nodes get =
unique ports doesn't seem to be thinking about other parallel tests =
running.  It will notice if another node is already bound to the port, =
but if another node has been killed and not yet restarted, won't things =
go off the rails?

I'm writing a parallel test just for this.  Will get back to you.

=E2=80=94
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company