Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from
 <pgsql-hackers-owner+M328475=pgsql-hackers-arkari@postgresql.org>)
	id 1dFwfK-00028c-B9
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 31 May 2017 05:59:30 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from
 <pgsql-hackers-owner+M328475=pgsql-hackers-arkari@postgresql.org>)
	id 1dFwfJ-0003zx-DF
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 31 May 2017 05:59:29 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1dFwdm-0000xD-Ay
	for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 31 May 2017 05:57:54 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1dFwdj-0000Uj-RR
	for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 31 May 2017 05:57:53 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v4V5v95K007643;
	Wed, 31 May 2017 01:57:09 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] quiet conversion warning in DatumGetFloat4
In-reply-to: <592E5ABF.8070706@anastigmatix.net>
References: <592E4D04.1070609@anastigmatix.net>
 <5894.1496208390@sss.pgh.pa.us> <592E5ABF.8070706@anastigmatix.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
	message dated "Wed, 31 May 2017 01:55:11 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <7641.1496210229.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 01:57:09 -0400
Message-ID: <7642.1496210229@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers>
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=help>
List-ID: <pgsql-hackers.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=sub%20pgsql-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> writes:
> On 05/31/17 01:26, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm.  I think it would be better to use DatumGetInt32 here.  Arguably,
>> direct use of GET_4_BYTES and its siblings should only appear in
>> DatumGetFoo macros.

> Like so?

Looks promising offhand, but I'm too tired to check in detail right now.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers