Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wKcnm-001Bwu-1I for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 May 2026 14:00:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wKcnl-00HEd8-0d for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 May 2026 14:00:37 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wKcnk-00HEcz-2V for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 May 2026 14:00:36 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wKcnh-00000000Urt-4AEK for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 06 May 2026 14:00:35 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 646E0XdK767886; Wed, 6 May 2026 10:00:33 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Tomas Vondra cc: PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: occasional ECPG failures on dikkop (FreeBSD) In-reply-to: <07a279bd-dcd4-4e6a-a5bb-2bc184f6017d@vondra.me> References: <07a279bd-dcd4-4e6a-a5bb-2bc184f6017d@vondra.me> Comments: In-reply-to Tomas Vondra message dated "Wed, 06 May 2026 15:56:30 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <767884.1778076033.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 10:00:33 -0400 Message-ID: <767885.1778076033@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Tomas Vondra writes: > about a month ago dikkop started reporting occasional failures in ECPG > tests. I'm not very familiar with ecpg, and I've been unable to figure > this out so far, so I wonder if others might know ... There's some related discussion in the ECPGprepared_statement() thread: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/75460b3c-255d-47eb-b889-d99de38= e6758%40gmail.com#61d8d4544dd7beaffaf7ec67ecdd5cfc I have no idea whether the bug that Andrew just identified explains dikkop's problem, though. regards, tom lane