Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wIWF1-008Abu-1u for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 18:36:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wIWEz-008PT6-0Q for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 18:36:01 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wIWEy-008PSx-2h for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 18:36:00 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wIWEw-000000044DJ-262E for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 18:36:00 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 63UIZtnj768567; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:35:55 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "Tristan Partin" cc: "pgsql-hackers" Subject: Re: Interest in hosting a buildfarm animal In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to "Tristan Partin" message dated "Thu, 30 Apr 2026 18:19:40 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <768565.1777574155.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:35:55 -0400 Message-ID: <768566.1777574155@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk "Tristan Partin" writes: > Due to a recent change in position, I am now in the position to host > buildfarm animals. Are there any configurations that don't have any > testing or enough testing? Perhaps something valgrind related? Let me > know! One silly thing I think is uncovered is whether a production build (*without* cassert or debug) gets any compiler warnings. We've so often written code that will generate "unused variable" or similar complaints if assertions are off, yet nobody notices that till well after commit. Developers are unlikely to test that way, and there are next to no BF animals that do either. regards, tom lane