Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1wKdls-001CqZ-0F
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org;
	Wed, 06 May 2026 15:02:44 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1wKdlq-00HWlC-3A
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org;
	Wed, 06 May 2026 15:02:42 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1wKdlq-00HWl2-2G
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org;
	Wed, 06 May 2026 15:02:42 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.98.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1wKdlo-00000000qEw-2inG
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org;
	Wed, 06 May 2026 15:02:42 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 646F2Zct771697;
	Wed, 6 May 2026 11:02:35 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
cc: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>,
        Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
        PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
In-reply-to: <aftTyjC_xWp-n30S@nathan>
References: <aS9hkwnkWf3dZIA_@nathan>
 <347EA055-D626-414C-B10D-7E70041B9B55@gmail.com>
 <509793.1764715875@sss.pgh.pa.us> <afplW8DvRONDc1yl@nathan>
 <729177.1778039019@sss.pgh.pa.us> <aftTyjC_xWp-n30S@nathan>
Comments: In-reply-to Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
	message dated "Wed, 06 May 2026 09:44:26 -0500"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <771695.1778079755.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 11:02:35 -0400
Message-ID: <771696.1778079755@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/771696.1778079755%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> Some of our changes to pg_bsd_indent bumped INDENT_VERSION.  Should we do
> that here?

We already have an INDENT_VERSION bump queued for the
space-between-comma-and-period change.  I don't think we need two
bumps in this cycle, as long as we coordinate pushing these changes.

			regards, tom lane