From: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
cc: Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com>,
    Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>, smithpb2250@gmail.com,
    torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com, horikyota.ntt@gmail.com,
    michael@paquier.xyz, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, bungina@gmail.com,
    pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall
In-reply-to: <202411151222.7qbg5ujnrnxt@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <202411151222.7qbg5ujnrnxt@alvherre.pgsql>
Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
   message dated "Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:22:21 +0100."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <7820.1732167825.1@antos>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 06:43:45 +0100
Message-ID: <7822.1732167825@antos>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7822.1732167825%40antos>
Precedence: bulk

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:

> Oh wow, thanks for noticing that.  I had already rewritten the commit
> message to some extent, but "master" had remained.  Now I pushed the
> patch to branches 14+, having replaced it as you suggested.

When doing some unrelated work I noticed that in the new test
010_keep_recycled_wals.pl the server fails to reload the configuration
file. The line it complains about is

archive_command = '/usr/bin/perl -e 'exit(1)''

The test still succeeds for some reason.

-- 
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com