Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cnr46-00031F-JH for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:20:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cnr46-0005ii-5o for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:20:58 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cnr2Z-0000hp-Jv for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:19:23 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cnr2X-0000Vh-6f for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:19:22 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v2EIJIjF007829; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:19:18 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: Alvaro Herrera , Tomas Vondra , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: WIP: Faster Expression Processing v4 In-reply-to: <20170314175210.ihivbuu7pjbugoe4@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <20170314065259.ffef4tfhgbsaieoe@alap3.anarazel.de> <20170314114424.sjwabl777zuaj4zx@alvherre.pgsql> <20170314175210.ihivbuu7pjbugoe4@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:52:10 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7827.1489515558.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:19:18 -0400 Message-ID: <7828.1489515558@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Andres Freund writes: > On 2017-03-14 08:44:24 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> It would be good to have someone at least read it before pushing, but >> I don't think anyone other than you has done so. > I'd love for somebody else > to look through it, I tried asking multiple times... Seems like > threatening a commit is the best way to get it :P I'm willing to look, but the last few messages make it sound like you're not all that close to a finished version. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers