Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ea2YG-00060Q-7k for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:51:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ea2YF-0002nz-1n for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:51:31 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ea2YE-0002no-Em for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:51:30 +0000 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ea2YB-00089U-2X for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:51:28 +0000 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8ED20A8C; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:51:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:51:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=prpqwa 3ukR8S1mSOmB7uvBhkQWIjmHoB4OLNrrVjvng=; b=fH55K77/xY7BPjR8rxAGGl 4KEbXSjkFlgAWovMhvrRsPXSlOgAoiqf0qDQlfmxaa+k3fxLcOJf7Ij6LR27godJ c6o64cODXAUqH2LO7L0TsmhvNItypu8yDbQ7N8zI3bomRWP8o5pq+sHt1JTr5yBP f98XBwgYrcBJ5iJODyQdxFmNCTES8m5k9TUh2uoW1saW4kZlu8XQ7fDtJg+uGMk2 IRnsZQ/a7Oct7RjeAvi5GMR9cCRehB/pfpbsx84FJCOpNgovCieN0/W/izzz6DOp 6UQIiLQrZgYuexcj7iNUOBgL/KEvKqgOVxxhUHMLkNo4XWOk0kQ/qMYo2udMPUoA == X-ME-Sender: Received: from april.local (c-73-13-66-39.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.13.66.39]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 649DE7E3D4; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:51:25 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table To: Alvaro Herrera , David Rowley References: <20180111185207.lrde2jlvvhsbyntd@alvherre.pgsql> Cc: Robert Haas , Amit Langote , Jesper Pedersen , Simon Riggs , Pg Hackers , Maksim Milyutin , Jaime Casanova From: Peter Eisentraut Organization: 2ndQuadrant Message-ID: <7861b08a-4c59-8440-4fa9-7771de22c927@2ndquadrant.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:51:24 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180111185207.lrde2jlvvhsbyntd@alvherre.pgsql> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 1/11/18 13:52, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > The delta patch turned out to have at least one stupid bug, and a few > non-stupid bugs. Here's an updated version that should behave > correctly, and addresses all reported problems. It seems that CompareIndexInfo() still doesn't compare indexes' operator classes and collations. Also, some new test cases for pg_dump would be nice. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services