Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qqqcP-001KfZ-EQ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 08:00:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qqqcM-004SeN-Hb for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 08:00:27 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qqqcM-004SeE-3j for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 08:00:26 +0000 Received: from mail.postgrespro.ru ([93.174.131.139]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qqqcI-000869-Qc for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 08:00:26 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.8] (109-252-88-77.nat.spd-mgts.ru [109.252.88.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: a.melnikov@postgrespro.ru) by mail.postgrespro.ru (Postfix/587) with ESMTPSA id AEB7FE203DB for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 11:00:22 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=postgrespro.ru; s=mx2023; t=1697097622; bh=cRxb4AlqRtQpmixVFGrSDC0JeiFMyYcU+VYcG1VSc8A=; h=Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:To:From:Subject:From; b=SjsLYVaCJOjdovx0FGsJi3gJeKarwZsCUPuNTf4+94PebPkqCMFu8xWAO0KRGlvBE b/jD8vGcZrwWeIxIF4kOGhXoPDDIkd13xuwhB9guDDRxtphbXjwsokxaA05Oq7Y4vz iObbcK4nlF1ruEO5HNkw+bfDweMSarQccZISCGzS5usRWR6thsm3kJurX9WxitdFkB HhV3VfhNzMv14xP5cQXAMSu9ZYnjDLsev5HSgzYdPjUFkIEXHhk4Ajcq7dPspyuCBQ Mks7/MmcJ7wq/D7Lzr8PedgxHTiDisJ1wION3lDCkh100HbOMEoKbxhyaONfMeKtlo 5ncflH6TQBHpg== Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------QivfROu5lVC1RrlTGQXUnDkV" Message-ID: <79e2f903-8bb0-4fc9-840c-f30d878d2327@postgrespro.ru> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 11:00:22 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" From: "Anton A. Melnikov" Subject: Some performance degradation in REL_16 vs REL_15 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------QivfROu5lVC1RrlTGQXUnDkV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetengs! Found that simple test pgbench -c20 -T20 -j8 gives approximately for REL_15_STABLE at 5143f76: 336+-1 TPS and for REL_16_STABLE at 4ac7635f: 324+-1 TPS The performance drop is approximately 3,5% while the corrected standard deviation is only 0.3%. See the raw_data.txt attached. How do you think, is there any cause for concern here? And is it worth spending time bisecting for the commit where this degradation may have occurred? Would be glad for any comments and concerns. With the best regards, -- Anton A. Melnikov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company --------------QivfROu5lVC1RrlTGQXUnDkV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; name="raw_data.txt" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="raw_data.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 UkVMXzE1X1NUQUJMRSBhdCA1MTQzZjc2LCBUUFMKMzM2LjYzOTc2NQozMzQuMzc2ODAxCjMz NC45NjMxMjEKMzM2LjIzNjY2CjMzNS42OTg2NzMKClJFTF8xNl9TVEFCTEUgYXQgNGFjNzYz NWYsIFRQUwozMjQuMzczNjk1CjMyMy4xNjg2MjIKMzIzLjcyODY1MgozMjUuNzk5OTAxCjMy NC44MTc1OQoK --------------QivfROu5lVC1RrlTGQXUnDkV--