Message-ID: <7c1eeafb-2375-4ff6-8469-0640d52d44ed@vondra.me>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:33:49 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more)
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
To: Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
 PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
References: <510b887e-c0ce-4a0c-a17a-2c6abb8d9a5c@enterprisedb.com>
 <CA+TgmoabtPvTffKQiqKg9qOmyt-sYzjQW+TyFWf1CBN7M4hggQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <9266c8df-0df7-4605-ba5a-b204c5e52586@enterprisedb.com>
 <52afd566-d110-43ea-ae72-69349d4414f6@vondra.me>
 <cba2406a-66bb-41ac-b1cf-bb898596e0e1@vondra.me>
 <CA+TgmoZ-40G7-WoLSsEH+7FqUzrP_0ndCOkewJ7ifAO6MVx0EA@mail.gmail.com>
 <b8c43eda-0c3f-4cb4-809b-841fa5c40ada@vondra.me>
 <CA+TgmobCBse3LYj9pfh-ELbP0VnffQS7jP_vNTGA7-KZP0gqDw@mail.gmail.com>
 <52f026c4-6c4e-4de2-bd78-609091d7c772@vondra.me>
 <CA+TgmoamAOj5e4J7WcC9g10AskvVPk5D7JoAvWw8DFnpHMiSQA@mail.gmail.com>
 <14cd8763-c905-4705-99c5-cbcc5db06f50@vondra.me>
 <0775ba8a-920c-4d37-b202-989a90b6ee4c@vondra.me>
 <c7282183-6a74-4797-9659-92e948e713b5@vondra.me>
 <CAKZiRmze8L6FeAKNQhZkn4NmUH2WZZyQ46GUm-Xuky5qr5DUoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <0f27b64b-5bf3-4140-98b7-635e312e1796@vondra.me>
 <3cebb4ab-1168-4259-8cb8-8a8ed7efeb43@vondra.me>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <3cebb4ab-1168-4259-8cb8-8a8ed7efeb43@vondra.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7c1eeafb-2375-4ff6-8469-0640d52d44ed%40vondra.me>
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

I've finally pushed this, after many rounds of careful testing to ensure
no regressions, and polishing. All changes since the version shared on
September 13 are only cosmetic - renaming a macro to keep it consistent
with the other ones, clarifying a couple comments etc. Nothing major.

I ended up squashing the two parts into a single commit. I thought about
keeping the two steps, but it seemed pointless - the first part inflated
the PGPROC struct, which I didn't like to commit, even if only as an
intermediate WIP state.

So far buildfarm didn't blew up, so let's hope it will stay that way.

I just realized there's no CF entry for this - sorry about that :-( I
started the thread a year ago to discuss an experimental patche, and it
never made it to CFA. But there was a discussion spanning a year, so
hopefully that's enough.


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra