Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFXBk-0007DL-Gk for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:05:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFXBj-0003u3-0o for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:05:23 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFXBi-0003tw-Q8 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:05:22 +0000 Received: from forward4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.238]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFXBe-0002yA-B7 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:05:22 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailforward.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D5A1940BF4; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:05:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:05:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=MXh+WDGAni3mUKxZ+Xd+pV5ZuUZalEYl2wDKYdmsF kw=; b=CKciZPer9hiaAyeixJdTTjYvZex3rpX5Z7miOd5AYQaAjs4XPXgFxCstU SUkUR36RcDTwVEQ/9Hi8tZDhX4I4HAamBfpjUatLUlTf70ublfBieRylqH/KHkzE rHFyIcPaQl43b8m5992dAokFXH2OcjDPn+I74BMYu2WQu7rkL1uj+hTUuiUvY9t2 0T70Bz55KPSc6dCSLFQGyY3U8UjsplqPuwO8BTcJC2Qy6khBQ2KYCM+tqDHIcXZi wlFP+l+Zb4neqZ07WDUR1TfKYcdgql0arwPmSkj3JLSSEwT65eaGLzIPPH+n4a6x BD8SEKYfODXR1RVJRCC19JyQ0n9XA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrledtgddutdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv rhcugfhishgvnhhtrhgruhhtuceophgvthgvrhdrvghishgvnhhtrhgruhhtsegvnhhtvg hrphhrihhsvggusgdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleevheehueeiudeiteei tdekueetleefteejffeiffdugedvffdvffdtiedvueeknecukfhppeekjedrudejjedrie elrddugedtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhho mhepphgvthgvrhdrvghishgvnhhtrhgruhhtsegvnhhtvghrphhrihhsvggusgdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from laptop206oxuk.local (p57b1458c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.177.69.140]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E90E5240054; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:05:14 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: SSL SNI To: Greg Stark Cc: Matthias van de Meent , pgsql-hackers References: <7289d5eb-62a5-a732-c3b9-438cee2cb709@enterprisedb.com> From: Peter Eisentraut Message-ID: <7cf218c9-0229-d005-57a1-c4c3e7f4f3a8@enterprisedb.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:05:12 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 26.02.21 03:40, Greg Stark wrote: > This still doesn't seem like it is IPv6-ready. Do you mean the IPv6 detection code is not correct? What is the problem? > Is there any harm in> having SNI with an IPv6 address there if it gets through? I doubt it.