Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkcpp-0000Qn-VB for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:00:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkcpp-0002xf-9z for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:00:37 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkcpo-0002vn-5E for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:00:36 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkcpk-0002UZ-IV for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:00:35 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id b187so317917wme.0 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:00:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CqPXTgNAD3XqPrUpooXeOUn7kDUz6Bgs9NiUnZmHazs=; b=vqRYm5YnUCKhEy1KKZ6v4n1W+5YfxaEglvHY6L8iftNXG7QZtkQCr/2sDLL3aiCBlr UbdL1I/4RGlRoh28SM+7xiKnowfPmYf/lNJUlfC3ZfVyq5QN1ChuCOpB3/wjdw47QNbi ZRaliHojTan2uNwn0hnymiLUH8Sf9303jeFTXFEZaf8xD0qvIBEz5WAlKQgfAnZ+on/q h9tahdeuNYDIG/bPpTP/FnWrRXe7TsgpW9VVwOh0FG4ubDOOxNiJgneo1DC/NAsfEBHG zRz/I0nB4MFfSFh5mEqPlgZiAshVFP5qK/K2jhRa1Ipiq+8v8wOX630fMAIUvOSVI1fo fDfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CqPXTgNAD3XqPrUpooXeOUn7kDUz6Bgs9NiUnZmHazs=; b=SEgT2KoTJJEx1qbtx6CkuwPHxLuYayH4XGdmFpevz7yK6K6NbNmMDADhOBtp1qGonq KID+f3Ih3y46Pg1V8PUL6S8xORENua5TV0IqKPNN3kIoGVaTEMAzfMi7aoKEU2FSYBEU G+gAai16oTS+55DcfNs0c49e1ZxRoLKJtmxgs3rUVC+pr+Qge8uc5jC0fJqnqFJduMhL hS5qUsMWehdW4L02fz8oK6X7Js/+U2z/x4wSKaVOSQFmKV5VZe9cdvlMIh4fy5+9ImLe /sbhRzPQVb9xIsrM1QCgd9NrZvXrumAHk01P9vRcM8dLTPbBpS8KuKvUqq6PjI/WA07R +M2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOFIYWEax3TUFLEMehyZ/Yj686jPzxIgHkmrYhyzEpjKjnQe7RlCm+QGa28kvapgQ== X-Received: by 10.28.174.11 with SMTP id x11mr4669756wme.41.1473969631587; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.111] (dsl-hkibrasgw1-58c38f-82.dhcp.inet.fi. [88.195.143.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ir9sm4964033wjb.16.2016.09.15.13.00.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more To: Christoph Berg , Michael Paquier , Andreas Karlsson , Victor Wagner , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Tom Lane References: <20160915143311.wiergigqmi5ink34@msg.df7cb.de> From: Heikki Linnakangas Message-ID: <7e4991a9-410f-5e1f-2a3a-e918e4a4bbbb@iki.fi> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 23:00:29 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160915143311.wiergigqmi5ink34@msg.df7cb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On 09/15/2016 05:33 PM, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Michael Paquier 2016-09-15 >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >>> I backpatched this to 9.5, but not further than that. The functions this >>> modified were moved around in 9.5, so the patch wouldn't apply as is. It >>> wouldn't be difficult to back-patch further if there's demand, but I'm not >>> eager to do that until someone complains. >> >> Not going older than 9.5 may be fine: >> https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2014/12/23/the-new-release-strategy/ >> https://wiki.freebsd.org/OpenSSL >> As far as I can see 1.0.2 would be supported until Dec 2019, so that >> would just overlap with 9.4's EOL. > > I'm afraid it's not that easy - Debian 9 (stretch) will release at the > beginning of next year, and apt.postgresql.org will want to build > 9.2/9.3/9.4 for that distribution. I guess yum.postgresql.org will > have the same problem with the next Fedora release. Can you elaborate? Are you saying that Debian 9 (strect) will not ship OpenSSL 1.0.2 anymore, and will require using OpenSSL 1.1.0? - Heikki -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers