Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czsev-0001zx-3B for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:28:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czset-0002ra-TX for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:28:39 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czsdO-0000F3-Rj for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:27:07 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czsdH-0006br-30 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:27:05 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v3GMQYI8008001; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:26:35 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andreas Karlsson cc: Alvaro Herrera , Christoph Berg , Heikki Linnakangas , Michael Paquier , Victor Wagner , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more In-reply-to: <3fe46983-e370-43d0-32b9-768017b4c0b7@proxel.se> References: <20160915153835.GA507447@alvherre.pgsql> <0c817abb-3f7d-20fb-583a-58f7593a0bea@proxel.se> <20047.1492305247@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3fe46983-e370-43d0-32b9-768017b4c0b7@proxel.se> Comments: In-reply-to Andreas Karlsson message dated "Sun, 16 Apr 2017 23:27:10 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7999.1492381594.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:26:34 -0400 Message-ID: <8000.1492381594@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Andreas Karlsson writes: > On 04/16/2017 03:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> 1. Back-patch that patch, probably also including the followup adjustments >> in 86029b31e and 36a3be654. > Given that I cannot recall seeing any complaints about the behavior of > 9.4 compared to 9.3 I am leaning towards #1. That way there are fewer > different versions of our OpenSSL code. Yeah, I was thinking about that point too. Barring objections I'll do #1 and then move forward with the openssl 1.1 backport. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers