Subject: Re: Hash support for row types
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <38eccd35-4e2d-6767-1b3c-dada1eac3124@2ndquadrant.com>
 <20201019233234.r6lyxbvdg5s77rvd@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <e88b1974-5987-9ae8-7e54-7d66f54751cb@2ndquadrant.com>
 <f7195e93-ab9d-01f0-1140-361aece79248@2ndquadrant.com>
 <395784.1605297108@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <d1a898b2-cd3d-0519-def9-5f38163c68e8@2ndquadrant.com>
 <934167.1605641620@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Organization: 2ndQuadrant
Message-ID: <809f4dbb-53ca-7758-a932-3094226c6ca3@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:44:43 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <934167.1605641620@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2020-11-17 20:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> I wrote a new patch to add a lot more tests around hash-based plans.
>> This is intended to apply separately from the other patch, and the other
>> patch would then "flip" some of the test cases.
> 
> OK, that addresses my concerns.

Thanks.  I have committed the tests and then subsequently the feature patch.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
2ndQuadrant, an EDB company
https://www.2ndquadrant.com/