Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uCkWL-001hnC-Qq for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 May 2025 19:33:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uCkWK-00Fw0b-Ql for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 May 2025 19:33:32 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uCkWK-00Fw0Q-Dm for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 07 May 2025 19:33:32 +0000 Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se ([93.188.3.37]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uCkWH-000gSR-2l for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 07 May 2025 19:33:32 +0000 Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DDE3A4FBD for ; Wed, 07 May 2025 21:33:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s980.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A123A54D6; Wed, 07 May 2025 21:33:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s470.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s980.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D1B22015A2; Wed, 07 May 2025 21:33:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: s470.loopia.se (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yesql.se Received: from s934.loopia.se ([172.22.191.6]) by s470.loopia.se (s470.loopia.se [172.22.190.34]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mfExK2RqgjKc; Wed, 7 May 2025 21:33:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 89.255.232.193 Received: from smtpclient.apple (customer-89-255-232-193.stosn.net [89.255.232.193]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se) by s934.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEB557CEA49; Wed, 07 May 2025 21:33:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yesql.se; s=loopiadkim1707475645; t=1746646408; bh=m5Ga6pnuKRX6uFjw8RZkFYm0T43WacLIdxr+mJqnEA8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=C8OEBOrSceN93foLm88Mvhm4VjXMqLdtok4gqzxOYtFIjV7ceJTrv/BrGw83ZgiOD 8LFStyYp4xTkGpaGSb5XUWs7jeEk0JhknQKFhAiIFruwWuXOVFPZXAsiLq0yaq1cVE IhaHdQfJvxWCAyVbNHTjAb/W7QdcqNixWx5jYNMG+SClcXOMBt4/GoHpafUpWp/USb x6QqIRgDmHtdKAJAlYKi/gx4hRpWZqx0qXae7yk4B+KcW9M/OcKV0U4SGYCSCYIzwz QMw4CSgE6zpUeALEWL8h7zlWZmdvKyOhM8RnQWFl077YDhAUehZAgZ4qbEqBDhHFrn GSsMRDkcLzIPg== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.1\)) Subject: Re: disabled SSL log_like tests From: Daniel Gustafsson In-Reply-To: <51363.1746646179@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 21:33:18 +0200 Cc: Thomas Munro , Andrew Dunstan , PostgreSQL Hackers , Jacob Champion Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8293D36E-8027-4DB8-AB41-5EA2C2A9A788@yesql.se> References: <984fca80-85a8-4c6f-a5cc-bb860950b435@dunslane.net> <2199758.1744901785@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1ce11d3f-624c-4003-a032-1b10cc138305@dunslane.net> <2814408.1745005558@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2859105.1745015195@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1120735.1745350422@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3058990.1746485124@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3227092.1746580691@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3248136.1746592452@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3004EFB2-8FFA-429A-AC5E-E3F40E002A94@yesql.se> <3320404.1746633879@sss.pgh.pa.us> <8E3E58BF-CC99-4C45-9FB8-3BA83AA6FDC8@yesql.se> <51363.1746646179@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.1) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On 7 May 2025, at 21:29, Tom Lane wrote: >=20 > I filed a report with the LibreSSL folks, and the answer was basically > "yeah, we know RSA-PSS doesn't work; there are multiple things that > need fixing" [1]. So it seems like we'd better find a way to skip > that test case when using LibreSSL. Not sure what the most > appropriate check would look like. I haven't looked at the test in question yet, but we do skip some SSL = tests if running against libressl already so I assume this will be able to follow = the same pattern. -- Daniel Gustafsson