Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bOvp2-00089f-5l for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:50:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bOvp1-0003Ag-KM for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:50:07 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bOvng-0001fC-Mh for pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:48:44 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bOvnQ-0004Kb-HA for pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:48:43 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u6HMkUP9008320; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 18:46:30 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Stephen Frost cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation In-reply-to: <24950.1468682955@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <16638.1468620817@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20160716144800.GZ4028@tamriel.snowman.net> <24950.1468682955@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:29:15 -0400" Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 18:46:30 -0400 Message-ID: <8319.1468795590@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org I've gone ahead and pushed a patch that does all of the cosmetic renamings needed to clean up the global-object-names situation. I've not done anything yet about those special cases in the rolenames test, since it's open for discussion exactly what to do there. I figured that this patch was bulky enough, and mechanical enough, that there wasn't much point in putting it up for review; the buildfarm will do a lot better at finding any mistakes I may have made. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers