Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uMSDY-00C7ya-SN for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 14:02:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uMSDV-000j3W-UQ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 14:02:14 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uMSDV-000j2c-L7 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 14:02:14 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uMSDU-0000or-1O for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 14:02:13 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 553E1w4a839152; Tue, 3 Jun 2025 10:01:59 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Yura Sokolov cc: Michael Paquier , Nathan Bossart , Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: C11 / VS 2019 In-reply-to: References: <01a69441-af54-4822-891b-ca28e05b215a@eisentraut.org> Comments: In-reply-to Yura Sokolov message dated "Tue, 03 Jun 2025 11:01:06 +0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <839150.1748959318.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 10:01:58 -0400 Message-ID: <839151.1748959318@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Yura Sokolov writes: > Will it mean we can implement atomics in term of C11 atomics? Any such change would have to be supported by extensive performance testing to verify that there's not a regression on any supported platform. Yeah, it'd be cool if we could rip out a lot of that code, but we aren't going to just rip on faith. regards, tom lane