Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZgkt-0007oY-AX for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:35:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZgks-0005ic-Lk for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:35:06 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZgks-0005iL-F3 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:35:06 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eZgkp-0005fR-K3 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:35:05 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w0BHYxWQ008513; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:34:59 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Marina Polyakova cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: master make check fails on Solaris 10 In-reply-to: <0d3a9fa264cebe1cb9966f37b7c06e86@postgrespro.ru> References: <0d3a9fa264cebe1cb9966f37b7c06e86@postgrespro.ru> Comments: In-reply-to Marina Polyakova message dated "Thu, 11 Jan 2018 20:21:11 +0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8511.1515692099.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:34:59 -0500 Message-ID: <8512.1515692099@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Marina Polyakova writes: > Hello, hackers! I got a permanent failure of master (commit > ca454b9bd34c75995eda4d07c9858f7c22890c2b) make check on Solaris 10. > Regression output and diffs are attached. Hm, buildfarm member protosciurus is running a similar configuration without problems. Looking at its configuration, maybe you need to fool with LD_LIBRARY_PATH and/or LDFLAGS_SL? regards, tom lane