From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?F=C3=A9lix_GERZAGUET?= <felix.gerzaguet@gmail.com>
cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>,
        PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: bulk typos
In-reply-to: 
 <CANVwZts_8oUNpZbv5-brx3SvQM5b1s-w4OykbmtuLTbx7Mq3dg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180331105640.GK28454@telsasoft.com>
 <CANVwZts_8oUNpZbv5-brx3SvQM5b1s-w4OykbmtuLTbx7Mq3dg@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to =?UTF-8?Q?F=C3=A9lix_GERZAGUET?=
 <felix.gerzaguet@gmail.com>
	message dated "Sat, 31 Mar 2018 13:17:04 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <8561.1522609430.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2018 15:03:50 -0400
Message-ID: <8562.1522609430@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

=?UTF-8?Q?F=C3=A9lix_GERZAGUET?= <felix.gerzaguet@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
> wrote:
>> I needed another distraction so bulk-checked for typos, limited to
>> comments in *.[ch].

> I think you introduced another one while changing "explcitly" to
> "expilcitly" instead of "explicitly" :-)

LGTM for the most part, except for this change:

-                     * Therefore, we do not whinge about no-such-process.
+                     * Therefore, we do not whine about no-such-process.

I think that spelling is intentional, so I didn't change it.
Pushed the rest, with Felix's correction.

			regards, tom lane