Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jCOC4-0002yb-R4 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:48:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jCOC2-0006Nn-LH for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:48:10 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jCOC2-0006Ne-9Z for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:48:10 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jCOC0-0006fa-5d for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:48:09 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 02CDm3qU008617; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:48:03 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: Alvaro Herrera , Julien Rouhaud , Andres Freund , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: Add an optional timeout clause to isolationtester step. In-reply-to: <20200312074941.GB1739@paquier.xyz> References: <24078.1583958800@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20200311205254.GA2648@alvherre.pgsql> <20200312074941.GB1739@paquier.xyz> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:49:41 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8615.1584020883.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:48:03 -0400 Message-ID: <8616.1584020883@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > +1. A patch does not seem to be that complicated. Now isn't it too > late for v13? I think we've generally given new tests more slack than new features so far as schedule goes. If the patch ends up being complicated/invasive, I might vote to hold it for v14, but let's see it first. regards, tom lane