public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: =?UTF-8?B?5q615Z2k5LuBKOWIu+mfpyk=?= <[email protected]>
To: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Cc: Sami Imseih <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeremy Schneider <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rowley <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: 回复：回复：another autovacuum scheduling thread
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 10:25:54 +0800
Message-ID: <865495e3-13ea-4b6d-bad8-5d48e3d05a90.duankunren.dkr@alibaba-inc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aRYnqTGMeEnRzWta@nathan>
References: <aRYnqTGMeEnRzWta@nathan>
Thank you for your reply. You are absolutely right, and I apologize for straying off-topic in this thread. I have moved my thoughts to a separate thread [0].
[0]https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fffdd62e-4d97-4701-ad57-0cd3ef1ebef4.duankunren.dkr%40alibaba-... <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fffdd62e-4d97-4701-ad57-0cd3ef1ebef4.duankunren.dkr%40alibaba-... >
------------------------------------------------------------------
发件人：Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
发送时间：2025年11月14日(周五) 02:47
收件人："段坤仁(刻韧)"<[email protected]>
抄 送：Sami Imseih<[email protected]>; Jeremy Schneider<[email protected]>; Robert Treat<[email protected]>; David Rowley<[email protected]>; Robert Haas<[email protected]>; "pgsql-hackers"<[email protected]>
主 题：Re: 回复：another autovacuum scheduling thread
On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 02:37:31AM +0800, 段坤仁(刻韧) wrote:
> Hi all, I have read the discussion in this thread and am pleased to see the
> community working collaboratively to address some long-standing autovacuum
> problems. Nathan's patch implementation is quite promising and demonstrates
> considerable potential. I have previously attempted similar approaches; however,
> I was unable to develop such a comprehensive and well-formulated calculation
> framework. We would certainly welcome the integration of this improvement into
> v19 or subsequent versions.
Thanks!
> I have tried Nathan's V7 patch and implemented some cost delay mechanisms
> based on it that might be helpful for the issues you guys mentioned.
Unfortunately, cost delay adjustments are off-topic for this thread, as I
hinted yesterday [0]. I'd certainly like to explore this idea, but if we
can't keep the discussion focused, it'll be hard to get anything committed.
[0] https://postgr.es/m/aRTpqMleDpoQm9OO%40nathan <https://postgr.es/m/aRTpqMleDpoQm9OO%40nathan >
--
nathan
view thread (143+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: 回复：回复：another autovacuum scheduling thread
In-Reply-To: <865495e3-13ea-4b6d-bad8-5d48e3d05a90.duankunren.dkr@alibaba-inc.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox