Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1twThN-00Ev3d-QG for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 22:21:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1twThM-006dAg-GZ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 22:21:40 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1twThM-006d6i-6O for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 22:21:40 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1twThJ-000kT4-1C for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 22:21:39 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 52NMLXmp866453; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:21:33 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> cc: jian he , Joe Conway , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: System views for versions reporting In-reply-to: References: <5jhyl6p3nwcaxczfxuh25q42q6bqlaxyqyfqtw4tldvmm24bw2@rfii5tkwn5rg> Comments: In-reply-to Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> message dated "Sat, 25 Jan 2025 20:46:58 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <866450.1742768493.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:21:33 -0400 Message-ID: <866452.1742768493@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> writes: > Thanks for checking this out. Here is the updated version with applied > changes. The tests were failing due to injection_points library > apparently linking something twice, triggering a duplication error I > didn't expect. Since apparently it can happen, I'm just overwriting > duplicates. FWIW, I think the 0004 patch is about to be mostly obsoleted by Andrei's proposal at [1]. To the extent that it's not obsoleted, I question whether it's something we want at all, given the ground rule that unprivileged users are not supposed to have access to info about the server's filesystem. regards, tom lane [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/dd4d1b59-d0fe-49d5-b28f-1e4= 63b68fa32@gmail.com