Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fJQKJ-0005ou-CX for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 May 2018 21:20:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fJQKI-0005FA-4g for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 May 2018 21:20:42 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fJQKH-0005F1-Tm for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 May 2018 21:20:41 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fJQKF-0002nL-G4 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 May 2018 21:20:41 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w4HLKOpd008780; Thu, 17 May 2018 17:20:24 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Dagfinn Ilmari =?iso-8859-1?Q?Manns=E5ker?= , Peter Eisentraut , Pavel Stehule , Nikita Glukhov , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Transform for pl/perl In-reply-to: <20180517211123.wrml3yvrl3b2rmrq@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20180517211123.wrml3yvrl3b2rmrq@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Thu, 17 May 2018 17:11:23 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8778.1526592024.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 17:20:24 -0400 Message-ID: <8779.1526592024@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > This is still listed as an open item, though the patch proposed by Peter > upthread has been committed. If I understand correctly, ilmari was > going to propose another patch. Or is the right course of action to set > the open item as resolved? AIUI, ilmari complained about several things only some of which have been resolved, so that this is still an open item. But I think the ball is in his court to propose a patch. regards, tom lane