Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F0C9F9A3B for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:09:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91676-05 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:09:27 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from oxford.xeocode.com (unknown [87.127.95.196]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A25B9F996F for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:09:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost.enta.net ([127.0.0.1] helo=oxford.xeocode.com) by oxford.xeocode.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IY3zE-0001FH-Ve; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:09:21 +0100 To: "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" , "Tom Lane" , Subject: Re: curious regression failures In-Reply-To: <46F14C93.4040908@kaltenbrunner.cc> (Stefan Kaltenbrunner's message of "Wed\, 19 Sep 2007 18\:21\:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Draft-From: ("nnimap+mail01.enterprisedb.com:INBOX.hackers" 13658) References: <200709141720.l8EHKwX13792@momjian.us> <87bqc5m90n.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> <12919.1189792669@sss.pgh.pa.us> <46EADA0A.3040504@kaltenbrunner.cc> <12435.1189821208@sss.pgh.pa.us> <46EC07E7.9000100@kaltenbrunner.cc> <28630.1189875785@sss.pgh.pa.us> <46ED527A.4090108@kaltenbrunner.cc> <20616.1190214860@sss.pgh.pa.us> <46F1468F.1080903@dunslane.net> <46F14C93.4040908@kaltenbrunner.cc> From: Gregory Stark Organization: EnterpriseDB Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:09:20 +0100 Message-ID: <877immil2n.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200709/795 X-Sequence-Number: 107947 "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" writes: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> pgbfprod=# select sysname, stage, snapshot from build_status where log ~ >> $$read only \d+ of \d+ bytes$$; >> sysname | stage | snapshot >> -----------+--------------+--------------------- >> zebra | InstallCheck | 2007-09-11 10:25:03 >> wildebeest | InstallCheck | 2007-09-11 22:00:11 >> baiji | InstallCheck | 2007-09-12 22:39:24 >> luna_moth | InstallCheck | 2007-09-19 13:10:01 > > hmm all of those seem to fail the foreign key checks in a very similiar > way and that are vastly different platforms (windows,solaris,openbsd and > linux). Is this exhaustive? That is, are we sure this never happened before Sept 11th? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com