Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B341F138C418 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:52:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 30.55.colo.spiretech.net ([69.168.55.30] helo=lists.commandprompt.com) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SJHS3-0006ei-9g for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 04:52:41 +0000 Received: from clam (spinlock.commandprompt.com [69.168.55.30]) by lists.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B2C04130; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 21:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from clam ([195.88.15.88] helo=clam) by assp.commandprompt.com with ESMTPS(AES128-SHA) (2.1.1); 14 Apr 2012 21:52:27 -0700 From: Alex To: Jay Levitt Cc: Peter Eisentraut , Robert Haas , Tom Lane , Greg Smith , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Last gasp References: <20120409222359.GE30702@tornado.leadboat.com> <4F83FCB10200002500046D70@gw.wicourts.gov> <4F84D3A0.8010808@2ndQuadrant.com> <1334165303.25392.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <28338.1334168965@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1334180206.25392.39.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <1334350086.9019.16.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <878vhyeqyq.fsf@commandprompt.com> <4F89ED6C.4030609@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:52:16 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4F89ED6C.4030609@gmail.com> (Jay Levitt's message of "Sat, 14 Apr 2012 17:34:36 -0400") Message-ID: <87d379mwan.fsf@commandprompt.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Assp-Version: 2.1.1(11364) on assp.commandprompt.com X-Assp-Client-TLS: yes X-Assp-ID: assp.commandprompt.com m1-65550-08540 X-Assp-Envelope-From: ash@commandprompt.com X-Assp-Intended-For: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org X-Assp-Original-Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Last gasp X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201204/759 X-Sequence-Number: 206562 Jay Levitt writes: > Alex wrote: >> I didn't follow this whole thread, but have we considered Redmine[1]? > > As the resident "Ruby is shiny, let's do everything in Rails on my > MacBook" guy, I'd like to make a statement against interest: I've > tried Redmine a few times and it's been painful. Much of the codebase > is deprecated, it's slow, it has no meaningful search (in 2012?!), > I've seen wiki edits disappear, and at the moment pulling up its own > FAQ page at redmine.org times out. Yay, that's totally FUD to me. Could you please elaborate a bit on your points? Deprecated codebase? Let me guess... It runs on an outdated version of Rails (2.3) but only because Rails is changing so rapidly, I believe. There is work in progress[1] to move to the supported branch Rails-3.x. Slow? Do you have any data to back this point up? No meaningful search, eh? Works for me. Disappearing wiki edits? Never seen that, but you can always file a bug. > Maybe you've had better luck with it, but whenever I've Googled for > Redmine questions, the collective Internet has sighed and said "Yeah, > it was a really good idea, though." Certainly *you've* had some terrible luck with it. ;-) -- Regards, Alex [1] http://www.redmine.org/issues/4796