References: <87il0smqa9.fsf@163.com> <ZhOABqA_zyF6Xgnm@paquier.xyz>
User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 29.1
From: Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213@163.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tomas Vondra
 <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Replace FunctionCall2Coll with FunctionCallInvoke
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 13:36:20 +0800
In-reply-to: <ZhOABqA_zyF6Xgnm@paquier.xyz>
Message-ID: <87edbgmmz8.fsf@163.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/87edbgmmz8.fsf%40163.com>
Precedence: bulk


Hello Michael, 

> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 12:25:00PM +0800, Andy Fan wrote:
>> During the review of using extended statistics to improve join estimates
>> [1], I found some code level optimization opportunities which apply to
>> existing code as well. To make the discussion easier, open this new
>> thread.
>
> Is that measurable?

I didn't spent time on testing it. Compared with if the improvement is
measureable, I'm more interested with if it is better than before or
not. As for measurable respect, I'm with the idea at [1]. Do you think
the measurable matter? 

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZJ0a_Dcn%2BST4YSeSrLnnmajmcsi7ZvEpgkKNiF0SwBuw%40mail.gmail.com 

-- 
Best Regards
Andy Fan