Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099D664FCDD for ; Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:47:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52033-02 for ; Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:47:27 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6B264FC58 for ; Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:47:26 -0400 (AST) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so2180908yxb.73 for ; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 14:47:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.181.19 with SMTP id d19mr14763704qbf.24.1231022844704; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 14:47:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from oxford.xeocode.com.enterprisedb.com (76-10-172-69.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.172.69]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k29sm33595005qba.7.2009.01.03.14.47.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 03 Jan 2009 14:47:23 -0800 (PST) To: Peter Eisentraut Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Greg Stark , Robert Haas , Tom Lane , ITAGAKI Takahiro Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: posix_fadvise v22 In-Reply-To: <200901032342.19435.peter_e@gmx.net> (Peter Eisentraut's message of "Sat\, 3 Jan 2009 23\:42\:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Draft-From: ("nnimap+imap.gmail.com:HACKERS" 52359) References: <603c8f070901012011hca2c36flf527a5cd01695205@mail.gmail.com> <262184F8-1206-4E2C-B50F-9FF84E63C1B6@enterprisedb.com> <200901032342.19435.peter_e@gmx.net> From: Gregory Stark Organization: EnterpriseDB Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:47:21 -0500 Message-ID: <87iqowt3ba.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200901/143 X-Sequence-Number: 130787 Peter Eisentraut writes: > On Friday 02 January 2009 06:49:57 Greg Stark wrote: >> The guc run-time check is checking for known-buggy versions of glibc =A0 >> using sysconf to check what version of glibc you have. > > Could you please mention the bug number in the relevant source code comme= nts? It's Debian bug# 312406 which was fixed in Debian release 2.3.5-3. So it's probably one of these but searching for posix_fadvise doesn't find anything= in their bug tracker: Version 2.3.6 * The following bugs are resolved with this release: 38, 253, 549, 622, 653, 721, 758, 851, 877, 915, 934, 955, 961, 1016, 1037, 1076, 1079, 1080, 1081, 1082, 1083, 1084, 1085, 1086, 1087, 1088, 1090, 1091, 1092, 1093, 1094, 1095, 1096, 1097, 1098, 1099, 1100, 1101, 1102, 1103, 1104, 1105, 1106, 1107, 1108, 1109, 1110, 1111, 1112, 1113, 1125, 1137, 1138, 1249, 1250, 1251, 1252, 1253, 1254, 1350, 1358, 1394, 1438, 1498, 1534 Visit for the details of each b= ug. --=20 Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!