Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE221F66B31 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:34:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 30.55.colo.spiretech.net ([69.168.55.30] helo=lists.commandprompt.com) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKSD1-0000Ic-Js for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:34:03 +0000 Received: from moon (spinlock.commandprompt.com [69.168.55.30]) by lists.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7EE2E253; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moon ([46.173.86.153] helo=moon) by assp.commandprompt.com with ESMTPS(AES128-SHA) (2.1.1); 18 Apr 2012 03:33:50 -0700 From: Alex Shulgin To: Robert Haas Cc: Magnus Hagander , Jay Levitt , Dimitri Fontaine , Alvaro Herrera , Peter Eisentraut , Tom Lane , Greg Smith , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: Bug tracker tool we need References: <4F84D3A0.8010808@2ndQuadrant.com> <1334165303.25392.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <28338.1334168965@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1334180206.25392.39.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <1334350086.9019.16.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <878vhyeqyq.fsf@commandprompt.com> <4F89ED6C.4030609@gmail.com> <87d379mwan.fsf@commandprompt.com> <1334540156-sup-2520@alvh.no-ip.org> <878vhwnjhv.fsf@hi-media-techno.com> <877gxf7ihf.fsf_-_@commandprompt.com> <4F8C93B2.1000503@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:33:38 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Robert Haas's message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:07:30 -0400") Message-ID: <87y5ptgwhp.fsf@commandprompt.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Assp-Version: 2.1.1(11364) on assp.commandprompt.com X-Assp-Client-TLS: yes X-Assp-ID: assp.commandprompt.com m1-45232-04757 X-Assp-Envelope-From: ash@commandprompt.com X-Assp-Intended-For: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org X-Assp-Original-Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug tracker tool we need X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201204/966 X-Sequence-Number: 206769 Robert Haas writes: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> That's probably one reason people aren't jumping on this. Because >> there is no tracker out there that people actually *like*... > > I think this is a point worth serious thought. I wonder why do people keep complaining how their bug tracker of choice sucks, instead of doing something about that. I can see a few possible factors: a) people do like to complain, and it's easier than submitting meaningful bug reports or feature requests, patches :-) b) the developers don't listen to their users, which happens far too often unfortunately c) (I had yet another idea here, but I forgot what it was :-p) d) a wild mix of the above However, this doesn't imply existing tracker software cannot be improved and more of that must be written from scratch (unless the code is cryptic and/or is written, probably poorly, in some rarely used programming language, and is unmaintainable.) Also, the reasons outlined above do not pertain only to bug tracker software somehow: any piece of software could suffer from that and I believe many of us have seen it. So maybe there's something fundamentally wrong with every existing bug tracker (e.g. they don't fix bugs for you?) Well, just kidding. ;-) -- Alex