Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZThXT-0005P8-K8 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 02:31:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZThXS-0006SF-5S for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 02:31:10 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZThW9-0004vJ-Fu for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 02:29:49 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZThW2-0006Yi-NV for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 02:29:48 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7O2Tbks008908; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:29:37 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: David Rowley cc: Tomas Vondra , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique In-reply-to: References: <20150320.121140.148610378.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> <27152324.eFKJb4Khb5@dinodell> <8608754a32d1325c2f83ba8b1df71585@xs4all.nl> <55DA1F9F.5040204@2ndquadrant.com> <5085.1440375543@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to David Rowley message dated "Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:50:13 +1200" Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:29:37 -0400 Message-ID: <8907.1440383377@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org David Rowley writes: > On 24 August 2015 at 12:19, Tom Lane wrote: >> I am not exactly convinced that this behavior needs to be visible in >> EXPLAIN output at all, but if it does, it should be a separate field. > I have to admit I don't much like it either, originally I had this as an > extra property that was only seen in EXPLAIN VERBOSE. Seems like a reasonable design from here. (Note that for non-text output, I'd say the field should come out unconditionally. We only care about abbreviating in text mode.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers