public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
Cc: Jakub Wartak <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more)
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 17:09:43 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<ffiwtzc6vedo6wb4gbwelon5nefqg675t5c7an2ta7pcz646cg@qwmkdb3l4ett>
	<[email protected]>
	<5xahykogf2sg3ofdqk2li7xx3t2vh23m42jnvfwxoi5fhh7iya@girlhoxdxjzc>
	<[email protected]>
	<vgtms7b5egxdypmknxpobocqton3puhprk3ahhk45rcx4uyl33@6uetxejsc75r>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<nubyc3twqd7mtuyc2rbbt2yazjzbat6mlpfgxtb2ppv2egci3g@uvptf7xmh46m>
	<[email protected]>
	<qdvrgej743lcddjnb4lzyakt3f5bs2oz34r274wbmgc2g4474q@utqqrqiih65h>
	<[email protected]>


On 2025-03-04 Tu 5:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <[email protected]> writes:
>> On 2025-03-04 16:30:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Yeah, I've been poking at that.  It's not at all clear why the
>>> animal is trying to run src/test/modules/ldap_password_func
>>> now when it didn't before.
>> It did do so before as well, afaict:
>> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=sifaka&dt=2025-03-04%2015%3A01%3A4...
>> It seems to me that the difference is that now checkprep is run, whereas
>> previously it wasn't.
> Maybe, but still I don't see any changes in the BF client that'd
> explain it.  The animal's configuration hasn't changed either;
> the only non-comment diff in its buildfarm.conf is
>
> @@ -374,7 +376,7 @@
>   
>          base_port => 5678,
>   
> -       modules => [qw(TestUpgrade TestDecoding)],
> +       modules => [qw(TestUpgrade)],
>   
>          # settings used by run_branches.pl
>          global => {
>
> which I changed to follow the lead of build-farm.conf.sample.
> But surely that wouldn't affect this!?
>
> 			



I think I found a logic bug. Testing.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com







view thread (34+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more)
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox