Message-ID: <8aed364e-f572-4561-b4fc-ff149067b670@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 11:00:01 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.2
Subject: Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
Content-Language: en-US
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
 Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>,
 PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
References: <212b0987-83e5-e2ae-c5e8-b8170fdaf3a0@gmail.com>
 <CA+Tgmob4wzU4QE6jz_-Bk4R7dYzKJ0SVS5oi3UpfqjnNopAGvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEze2Who3iG9QXbV9gbWp3WvuwSh5D65Dzv9ktZEyxpRb_QvkQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoZd=pYk0owL4W2f4to9qFjwq_NmGJzXg44pEcMxuYriCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEze2WizrxyWg+xeVMuyVqfZc-8U1myy1V4H3zwV-7xXztVf2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoadPUdt8ZJ_Zem-T2_qZ5OTXVdxH6wGtnaV-TunN+LOHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEze2Wjbf==0=v+Ck8B2vcCeqD_3_SfDV3HtpEQiP-r3e2fsSA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmobTfzrnBesboXutZmrABdP79mO2HhXupY5YOdZ9VLWFog@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEze2WjhdVCqEe_qqEok3NA6DwUdOGSBjAxzmYdAqiaaH1uRcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoaQHtGNFczJzSO5sMobUpuikSHphtFPZpdLmjzwdmM1DQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240124170846.GA2643050@nathanxps13>
 <CA+TgmoZusu5g3rM1k=UB29Sf53c1OKjm1uFw9uo-sSXBLFZJiQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+TgmoZusu5g3rM1k=UB29Sf53c1OKjm1uFw9uo-sSXBLFZJiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8aed364e-f572-4561-b4fc-ff149067b670%40gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

24.01.2024 20:46, Robert Haas wrote:
> This is weird. There's a little more detail in the log file,
> regress_log_002_blocks, e.g. from the first failure you linked:
>
> [11:18:20.683](96.787s) # before insert, summarized TLI 1 through 0/14E09D0
> [11:18:21.188](0.505s) # after insert, summarized TLI 1 through 0/14E0D08
> [11:18:21.326](0.138s) # examining summary for TLI 1 from 0/14E0D08 to 0/155BAF0
> # 1
> ...
> [11:18:21.349](0.000s) #          got: 'pg_walsummary: error: could
> not open file "/home/nm/farm/gcc64/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/bin/pg_walsummary/tmp_check/t_002_blocks_node1_data/pgdata/pg_wal/summaries/0000000100000000014E0D0800000000155BAF0
> # 1.summary": No such file or directory'
>
> The "examining summary" line is generated based on the output of
> pg_available_wal_summaries(). The way that works is that the server
> calls readdir(), disassembles the filename into a TLI and two LSNs,
> and returns the result.

I'm discouraged by "\n1" in the file name and in the
"examining summary..." message.
regress_log_002_blocks from the following successful test run on the same
sungazer node contains:
[15:21:58.924](0.106s) # examining summary for TLI 1 from 0/155BAE0 to 0/155E750
[15:21:58.925](0.001s) ok 1 - WAL summary file exists

Best regards,
Alexander