Subject: Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
To: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
 Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>,
 "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: <16db4468-edfa-830a-f921-39a50498e77e@2ndquadrant.com>
 <19990.1500936945@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <3d250597-384e-c5f4-7533-b513e366888f@2ndquadrant.com>
 <CAJrrPGeQcsBXhuJA1vQ25PS0wAqfo0v_mXtwmt4VcOmxKSvfCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <94f58897-861b-accf-a9f1-af4be816c0d3@2ndquadrant.com>
 <CAJrrPGfTQ3w=5BdprWgQghuM7ujtBy2Sthr6zRwY0QeRBQd2RQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <13097.1509650125@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <3dca6a76-fa4b-66ab-c0db-496335d650b1@2ndquadrant.com>
 <CAB7nPqS4VSUiaFnGmR2k95-RtEi++SEwZk32pMu_31VLyMpK0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180105042528.GK2416@tamriel.snowman.net>
 <1e831867-c46c-8f21-79d4-5de70cac5822@2ndquadrant.com>
 <13711.1515440364@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <01387f5d-a95b-d159-becb-cf9ff9ba4e41@2ndquadrant.com>
 <db11d513-4af4-0d1b-514b-16617385f068@pgmasters.net>
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Message-ID: <8b29edcb-cbc0-5414-996f-520f75b94d3b@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 16:22:55 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <db11d513-4af4-0d1b-514b-16617385f068@pgmasters.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 03/05/2018 04:12 PM, David Steele wrote:
> Hi Tomas,
> 
> On 1/8/18 3:28 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/08/2018 08:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>>> As I already mentioned, Tom's updated patch is better than what I
>>>> posted initially, and I agree with his approach to the remaining
>>>> issues he pointed out. But I somehow assumed that he's already
>>>> looking into that. Tom, do you plan to look into this patch soon,
>>>> or should I?
>>>
>>> No, I thought you were going to run with those ideas. I have a lot
>>> of other stuff on my plate ...
>>>
>>
>> OK, will do.
> 
> What the status of this patch?  It's been waiting on author since last
> November, though I can see there was some confusion over who was working
> on it.
> 
> Given that it's a bug fix it would be good to see a patch for this CF,
> or very soon after.
> 

Yeah, it's the next thing on my TODO.


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services