Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tC6Ed-00BXD5-0M for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:00:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tC6Ea-00Cbpn-2R for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:00:16 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tC6EZ-00Cbpc-4S for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:00:16 +0000 Received: from fout-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.146]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tC6EV-0026ee-JO for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:00:13 +0000 Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.phl.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D7313800F4; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:00:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:00:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=justatheory.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s= 2016-12.pbsmtp; t=1731715209; x=1731801609; bh=g1gaaa/YPpFZOxWSa btofmUkk/Gi0lb7wRhGQuXmjRs=; b=LOv3+LFT7JJkKVCLXA6j0qh0DDMdwI5Uh BXFyqQpMySB+2V/dydANDKqxkfUU5tLn8HUyY0As17Fg0QriA4ay85JM9jVA/D8K AqSx+HMMdZsIq+/SrpJ40Zy6DUxU0fR0fHBg8trjKrt/ogn/6bZGVCKz75rEogzL Ba6nVc7KEc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1731715209; x= 1731801609; bh=g1gaaa/YPpFZOxWSabtofmUkk/Gi0lb7wRhGQuXmjRs=; b=U Jz1DOFNnMQnkOWaUOBmfLQSVuwZHekqApYJ+2GTqkIWkILJy1uFqqGoKkbUVLfdm nbaIFtYxk0qXFEKmb5nL7lvS40sKbASVt6sX9JGBCjMKGEwCxIjproAE4slEf8hr +ffzeR1qJMe4X1YsqysWHSi+y8qneHlg8SALyzCMlOgxig3ZXw6i0ghtANke/sm6 z2k7uRyL6hc5URT+VQc06qh8fIg3C+E0PFGH7m6R3ZZHxj9YlX1pyzV3GyoR9asi fdV7i5ocKUxnrHrSMUONJ3R1fJvZFkuMc9+02Iqi5XPPQY6P87PyxpP7ldVl9hXQ AF5yG9w6Oos70ZjvijVEA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrvdehgddujecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffr tefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnth hsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjffevgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtjeen ucfhrhhomhepfdffrghvihguucfgrdcuhghhvggvlhgvrhdfuceouggrvhhiugesjhhush htrghthhgvohhrhidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfefhvdettdfgieeufffg feehfeegffdtgeefgeetjedugfeigeevieetleduhfelnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthh husgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr ohhmpegurghvihgusehjuhhsthgrthhhvghorhihrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhope ekpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehtghhlsehsshhsrdhpghhhrdhp rgdruhhspdhrtghpthhtohepnhhorghhsehlvggruggsohgrthdrtghomhdprhgtphhtth hopegrlhgvkhhsrghnuggvrhesthhimhgvshgtrghlvgdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehp ghhsqhhlqdhhrggtkhgvrhhssehpohhsthhgrhgvshhqlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhope hmrghrtghordhslhhothesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegrlhhvhhgvrhhr vgesrghlvhhhrdhnohdqihhprdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepmhihohhnseguvggsihgrnh drohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehprghvrghnrdguvgholhgrshgvvgesghhmrghilhdrtgho mh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i7c334307:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:00:08 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.200.121\)) Subject: Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases From: "David E. Wheeler" In-Reply-To: <2500050.1731705196@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:00:02 -0500 Cc: Noah Misch , Aleksander Alekseev , pgsql-hackers , Marco Slot , Alvaro Herrera , Christoph Berg , Pavan Deolasee Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <900DE0C9-48C4-474C-BDC9-AD495D8D3F59@justatheory.com> References: <1976928.1731614974@sss.pgh.pa.us> <202411142033.u6za5a6ylj2k@alvherre.pgsql> <20241114224108.d0.nmisch@google.com> <2443809.1731683394@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20241115175223.68.nmisch@google.com> <2483970.1731702561@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2500050.1731705196@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.200.121) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Nov 15, 2024, at 16:13, Tom Lane wrote: > In other words, our current guidelines > for preserving ABI compatibility actually *created* this disaster, > because the HEAD change was fine from an ABI standpoint but what > was done in back branches was not. So we do need to rethink how > that's worded. What bit is mis-worded? The guidance Peter committed[1] says that = =E2=80=9CPostgreSQL makes an effort to avoid server ABI breaks in minor releases.=E2=80=9D It sounds to me like that effort = wasn=E2=80=99t held up in back-branches, the sources for minor releases. But maybe you had some other guidance in mind? D [1]: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/e54a42a=