Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pJGez-0003CJ-NR for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:24:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pJGey-0005t8-Jr for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:24:04 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pJGey-0005od-An for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:24:04 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pJGew-0004iO-Dg for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:24:03 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 30LGO1dW913641; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 11:24:01 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Andrew Dunstan cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner In-reply-to: <912484.1674317408@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <20200814202651.GA31108@alvherre.pgsql> <531251.1674234545@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20230120175806.iogdcra2xpmmh5de@awork3.anarazel.de> <538672.1674238787@sss.pgh.pa.us> <17455b0f-0161-9aa9-b6dd-1279e947b8f4@dunslane.net> <3cdb09f1-6375-4198-e8c1-e33ca4c96304@dunslane.net> <912484.1674317408@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Sat, 21 Jan 2023 11:10:08 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <913639.1674318241.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 11:24:01 -0500 Message-ID: <913640.1674318241@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk ... btw, can we get away with making the diff run be "diff -upd" not just "diff -u"? I find diff output for C files noticeably more useful with those options, but I'm unsure about their portability. regards, tom lane