Subject: Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
To: Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>,
 "Smith, Peter" <peters@fast.au.fujitsu.com>,
 David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>,
 "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>,
 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>,
 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Laurenz Albe
 <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>,
 Jing Wang <jingwangian@gmail.com>,
 PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
 Elvis Pranskevichus <elprans@gmail.com>
References: <20200228160535.GA32597@alvherre.pgsql>
 <abe22229-3f22-13d6-ae4d-afd87774e549@pgmasters.net>
 <CAJcOf-dMEKXxMVgRB5N1J3RXbW91uOyAJ0jxVA5edX7Ky3995Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <4769B138-389C-436A-A025-3CA3468ECD16@yesql.se>
 <CAJcOf-fYvLQEOG9ThE=AxpuA4Retnvjh7Q4MrBfyy43yDDK9kQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87EDE4DB-B82B-43EB-A349-EED4643F3C1D@yesql.se>
 <CAJcOf-cEMJMt5_b466+kwP4szosnnqTQft1M5=f8aAQzSV-sWA@mail.gmail.com>
 <9a795e59e0834b13bf8054107a491e57@G06AUEXCASMHB04.g06.fujitsu.local>
 <CAJcOf-cW9zR4c25DLESQsOmhQExiNxd+pAixUqmX-KkSANjvjA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHut+PsHXoQRDXH0eyA7MLtJ8bCuEjtcfiX+2yR1N0S0KpDptA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJcOf-dE2vWpmqgEWj_tJ+i-oss_hhn9QjGpth+xTAyZUCANCQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1947363.1601071129@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5708.1601145259@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAJcOf-f8a-ZTsNRaNNJXFKnwtdbkgYuwjX342zL_+qmJwQB8bw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>
Message-ID: <91749879-e086-02db-a4dd-44d49f0332b2@postgrespro.ru>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:26:08 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJcOf-f8a-ZTsNRaNNJXFKnwtdbkgYuwjX342zL_+qmJwQB8bw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk

On 30.09.2020 10:57, Greg Nancarrow wrote:
> Thanks for your thoughts, patches and all the pointers.
> I'll be looking at all of them.
> (And yes, the comma instead of bitwise OR is of course an error,
> somehow made and gone unnoticed; the next field in the struct is an
> enum, so accepts any int value).
>
> Regards,
> Greg Nancarrow
> Fujitsu Australia
>
CFM reminder.

Hi, this entry is "Waiting on Author" and the thread was inactive for a 
while. As far as I see, the patch needs some further work.
Are you going to continue working on it, or should I mark it as 
"returned with feedback" until a better time?

-- 
Anastasia Lubennikova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company