public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Amit Langote <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rowley <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 23:45:45 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+HiwqH7pYXfPZhHCKTmb_=C0z538wP8Mog+_j+vTi7JCVqnhQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+HiwqFGkMSge6TgC9KQzde0ohpAycLQuV7ooitEEpbKB0O_mg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+TgmoZ=92LxPeVJ20vf4vJ4o8dr7Q2seDQR=xLY04puLjDs_A@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqEAdv+1t+v6pkcH9pgsSXnBeHLchDuGRwXP-oEB4BCPmg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+TgmobN=+AoDE4JZioVpaRXJVCQ2Fa9Uw3TjC-OqnXWQ0uq1w@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqFOsJ21nmvoKtPkzxKfYzACajj-mAOoJ+-y_O6g+-v-aA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+TgmoanT5K44bHZqMXxjAKwyF7nhajKBrw-p-+HSyEzOVqX1w@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqGbnNGttKr8fK2pAYcC1JAapo=1nXO7OQs2M7+HmoVVpw@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqEYCpEqh2LMDOp9mT+4-QoVe8HgFMKBjntEMCTZLpcCCA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+TgmoYbpAC4fDWLBSg6MZ9SymyKrt3NSc42whin9Qbgm71nCQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CA+Tgmoakey5yO+TTp0Gntz5MdnMLhd+Ei-+HWuCszHJeVU_YVA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqEDuz6OaM0Rv2D6kXgK0Cusr7HtquZTPjan+U76AJm0pg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqH9-fAvpG-w9qYCcDWzK3vGPCMyw4f9nHzqkxXVuD1pxw@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqFq9UQiSJbGpJkmd0MkxqQLZWGk1+__tyk0QM+hmYHrrA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqERQkaKkE8TwNmFP2SDBykttAqBkwh_Niif9FqS! [email protected]>
<CA+HiwqGoORM+yfm8PhGWfHNUSBbSUgTQC=s5ieV8b4FX1yDBrg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAApHDvp_DjVVkgSV24+UF7p_yKWeepgoo+W2SWLLhNmjwHTVYQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqH7pYXfPZhHCKTmb_=C0z538wP8Mog+_j+vTi7JCVqnhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Amit Langote <[email protected]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 10:32 AM David Rowley <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 1. You've changed the signature of various functions by adding
>> ExecLockRelsInfo *execlockrelsinfo. I'm wondering why you didn't just
>> put the ExecLockRelsInfo as a new field in PlannedStmt?
> I'm worried about that churn myself and did consider this idea, though
> I couldn't shake the feeling that it's maybe wrong to put something in
> PlannedStmt that the planner itself doesn't produce.
PlannedStmt is part of the plan tree, which MUST be read-only to
the executor. This is not negotiable. However, there's other
places that this data could be put, such as QueryDesc.
Or for that matter, couldn't the data structure be created by
the planner? (It looks like David is proposing exactly that
further down.)
regards, tom lane
view thread (71+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox