Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BABBEC32B9
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:02:41 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from smtp.01.com ([199.36.142.181])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <josh@agliodbs.com>) id 1SIMTi-00018H-40
	for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:02:40 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CE04F5842
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:02:19 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp-out-2.01.com
Received: from smtp.01.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp-out-2.01.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id S4kp0oF3oKjy for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:02:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5374F5C59
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:02:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-1.01.com (mail.01.com [172.18.30.178])
	by smtp-out-2.01.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49814F5672;
	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:02:19 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:02:19 -0500 (CDT)
From: Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
	Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Message-ID: <928040714.275905.1334246539368.JavaMail.root@mail-1.01.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120412153448.GA3379@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: Last gasp
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [63.156.243.1]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.3_GA_3374 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/7.1.3_GA_3346)
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Archive-Number: 201204/652
X-Sequence-Number: 206455


> I think the big take-away, education-wise, is that for our project,
> committer == grunt work.  Remember, I used to be the big committer of
> non-committer patches --- need I say more.  ;-)  LOL

Well, promoting several people to committer specifically and publically because of their review work would send that message a lot more strongly than your blog would.   It would also provide an incentive for a few of our major contributors to do more review work, if it got them to committer.

--Josh Berkus