public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Laurenz Albe <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Bruno Bonfils <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexey Bashtanov <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: About #13489, array dimensions and CREATE TABLE ... LIKE
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 09:33:18 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 21:13 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 09:04:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
> > > > An alternate approach would
> > > > be to remove pg_attribute.attndims so we don't even try to preserve
> > > > dimensionality.
>
> > > I could get behind that, perhaps. It looks like we're not using the
> > > field in any meaningful way, and we could simplify TupleDescInitEntry
> > > and perhaps some other APIs.
>
> > So should I work on that patch or do you want to try? I think we should
> > do something.
>
> Let's wait for some other opinions, first ...
Looking at the code, I get the impression that we wouldn't lose anything
without "pg_attribute.attndims", so +1 for removing it.
This would call for some documentation. We should remove most of the
documentation about the non-existing difference between declaring a column
"integer[]", "integer[][]" or "integer[3][3]" and just describe the first
variant in detail, perhaps mentioning that the other notations are
accepted for backward compatibility.
I also think that it would be helpful to emphasize that while dimensionality
does not matter to a column definition, it matters for individual array values.
Perhaps it would make sense to recommend a check constraint if one wants
to make sure that an array column should contain only a certain kind of array.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
view thread (3+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: About #13489, array dimensions and CREATE TABLE ... LIKE
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox