Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dMJBz-00039b-M2 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 19:15:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dMJBy-0003kt-Rf for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 19:15:30 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dMJAR-0000zn-4b for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 19:13:55 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dMJAK-00079Y-Cn for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 19:13:54 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v5HJDhem009355; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 15:13:43 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Robert Haas cc: Peter Eisentraut , Alvaro Herrera , Stephen Frost , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" , Piotr Stefaniak Subject: Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation In-reply-to: References: <20170519173111.zp6igkcg53egdy4s@alvherre.pgsql> <29275.1497624664@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas message dated "Sat, 17 Jun 2017 13:41:28 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <9353.1497726823.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 15:13:43 -0400 Message-ID: <9354.1497726823@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Robert Haas writes: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> So I'm back to the position that we ought to stick the indent >> code under src/tools/ in our main repo. Is anyone really >> seriously against that? > Is it under the same license as everything else? Hm, now that you mention it, interesting point. I was about to answer that it's under the standard BSD license, but looking closer, I see that these files still quote the old 4-clause BSD license text (with the "advertising" clause). We need to get them adjusted to be 3-clause with no advertising. Looking into a FreeBSD source tree locally, I see that FreeBSD has removed the advertising clause from all their files --- sometimes without even remembering to renumber the old clause 4 to clause 3 ;-). So Piotr needs to do likewise to conform with FreeBSD policy. Once he has, it'll be identical text to the other BSD-origin files we have in our tree, eg src/port/getopt.c. Piotr: if you're unclear on the rationale for this, see the bottom of https://www.freebsd.org/copyright/license.html regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers