Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uU4Oa-00F2RJ-7s for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:13:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uU4OY-00CVrQ-AF for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:13:06 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uU4OY-00CVrI-11 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:13:06 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uU4OW-003k1L-2y for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:13:05 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 55OED0da936250; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:13:01 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Banck cc: Michael Paquier , Postgres hackers Subject: Re: Safeguards against incorrect fd flags for fsync() In-reply-to: <685a3ccd.170a0220.2d27e6.2232@mx.google.com> References: <20191009062640.GB21379@paquier.xyz> <68480868.5d0a0220.1e214d.68a6@mx.google.com> <947174.1749604175@sss.pgh.pa.us> <6849d7e8.5d0a0220.3dbe66.c4e1@mx.google.com> <685a3ccd.170a0220.2d27e6.2232@mx.google.com> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Banck message dated "Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:51:08 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <936248.1750774380.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:13:00 -0400 Message-ID: <936249.1750774380@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Michael Banck writes: > Is removing the debug_parallel_query=on configuration for HEAD a valid > mode of operation for a buildfarm animal? I ran the tests 10 times in a > row without issues today. Sure, especially on slower machines. It's pretty much owner's option whether to use that. regards, tom lane