public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Fujii Masao <[email protected]>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Refactor GetLockStatusData() by skipping unused backends and groups
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:23:15 +0900
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>



On 2024/10/24 11:12, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
>> So, probably
>> we can consider that this check is already in place. If it’s still worth adding,
>> perhaps placing it inside the FAST_PATH_SLOT() macro could be an option...
>> Or current assertion check is enough? Thought?
> 
> Given that it's already done in FAST_PATH_GET_BITS(), I think that's fine as it
> is and v2 LGTM.

Thanks for the review! Pushed.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

view thread (5+ messages)

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Refactor GetLockStatusData() by skipping unused backends and groups
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox