Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o7jpI-0006ag-KH for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 20:34:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o7jpG-00009f-NT for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 20:34:46 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o7jpG-00009N-EE for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 20:34:46 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o7jpD-0005K7-59 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 20:34:46 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 262KYZY2977854; Sat, 2 Jul 2022 16:34:35 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Geoghegan cc: Andres Freund , Noah Misch , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: AIX support - alignment issues In-reply-to: References: <20220702183354.a6uhja35wta7agew@alap3.anarazel.de> <968410.1656789743@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Geoghegan message dated "Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:12:27 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <977852.1656794075.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 16:34:35 -0400 Message-ID: <977853.1656794075@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Peter Geoghegan writes: > Maybe it is still worth hanging on to AIX support for the time being, > but it would be nice to have some idea of where we *will* finally draw > the line. If the complaints from Andres aren't a good enough reason > now, then what other hypothetical reasons might be good enough in the > future? It seems fairly likely that Postgres desupporting AIX will > happen (say) at some time in the next decade, no matter what happens > today. Agreed. But I think that this sort of thing is better driven by "when there's no longer anyone willing to do the legwork" than by project policy. IOW, we'll stop when Noah gets tired of doing it (and no one steps up to take his place). In the case at hand, given that the test added by 79b716cfb/c1da0acbb correctly detects troublesome catalog layouts (and no I've not studied it myself), I don't see that we have to do more right now. I am a little concerned though that we don't have access to the latest version of AIX --- that seems like a non-maintainable situation. regards, tom lane