public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Jakub Wartak <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more)
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 12:26:40 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CA+TgmoZ-40G7-WoLSsEH+7FqUzrP_0ndCOkewJ7ifAO6MVx0EA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CA+TgmobCBse3LYj9pfh-ELbP0VnffQS7jP_vNTGA7-KZP0gqDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CA+TgmoamAOj5e4J7WcC9g10AskvVPk5D7JoAvWw8DFnpHMiSQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAKZiRmze8L6FeAKNQhZkn4NmUH2WZZyQ46GUm-Xuky5qr5DUoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]! .us>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

On 9/23/24 01:06, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> writes:
>> On 9/22/24 17:45, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> #define FAST_PATH_GROUP(index)	\
>>> -	(AssertMacro(((index) >= 0) && ((index) < FP_LOCK_SLOTS_PER_BACKEND)), \
>>> +	(AssertMacro((uint32) (index) < FP_LOCK_SLOTS_PER_BACKEND), \
>>> ((index) / FP_LOCK_SLOTS_PER_GROUP))
> 
>> For the (x >= 0) asserts, doing it this way relies on negative values
>> wrapping to large positive ones, correct? AFAIK it's guaranteed to be a
>> very large value, so it can't accidentally be less than the slot count.
> 
> Right, any negative value would wrap to something more than
> INT32_MAX.
> 

Thanks. Pushed a fix for these issues, hopefully coverity will be happy.

BTW is the coverity report accessible somewhere? I know someone
mentioned that in the past, but I don't recall the details. Maybe we
should have a list of all these resources, useful for committers,
somewhere on the wiki?


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra






view thread (34+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more)
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox