Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhFya-000330-7v for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:54:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhFyY-0007Oq-OI for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:54:38 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhFyY-0007Oh-FZ for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:54:38 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhFyS-0001dn-29 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:54:38 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 19VInMZN985435; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 14:49:22 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Time to drop plpython2? In-reply-to: <20211031184548.g4sxfe47n2kyi55r@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <20211031184548.g4sxfe47n2kyi55r@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Sun, 31 Oct 2021 11:45:48 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <985433.1635706162.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 14:49:22 -0400 Message-ID: <985434.1635706162@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andres Freund writes: > To me it seems time to drop plpython2 support. Supporting plpython2 > until ~7 years after python2 is EOL is already quite long... It'd be one > thing if it were completely painless, but imo it's not. 7 years? Oh, you're envisioning dropping plpython2 in HEAD but keeping it alive in the back branches. Yeah, it's a bit hard to justify continuing support in HEAD. regards, tom lane